JobsProject Geologist/Engineer/Scientist
Arcadis logo

Project Geologist/Engineer/Scientist

Arcadis

Location

Lenexa, KS

Type

Full-time

Posted

5/12/2026

Compensation

$79,920 - $119,880 per year

Undergraduate with 5+ Years of Experience
Approval 98.4%·Filings 122·New hires 57·
Established Sponsor
·FY 2025

Job description

Arcadis is seeking an experienced Environmental Consultant to join their team in Lenexa, KS. The role focuses on environmental investigation, remediation, and permitting projects, requiring a dynamic individual with a background in geology, engineering, or environmental science. The position offers opportunities for career growth and involves both field and office-related tasks. The consultant will work closely with project managers to ensure compliance with federal and state regulations.

Requirements

  • Bachelor's degree in Geology, Engineering, Environmental Science, or related discipline
  • 7-10 years of relevant experience
  • 40-hour HAZWOPER certification

Responsibilities

  • Assist with environmental investigation, remediation, and permitting projects.
  • Produce complex workplans within the RCRA/CERCLA framework for subsurface investigations.
  • Evaluate data to support conceptual site models for environmental investigations.
  • Address client and regulatory comments on deliverables and drive the strategy for comment resolution.
  • Prepare cost estimates to support project budgets and evaluate subcontractor proposals.
  • Provide emergency response support for derailments and HAZMAT spills.

Benefits

  • Employees at Arcadis are often offered a supportive, inclusive culture with internal mobility, extensive learning and development resources, and the flexibility to choose benefits that fit their needs (varying by country). Many roles also emphasize purpose and community—through sustainability initiatives, charitable programs like Shelter, and regular social and volunteer events—so people can grow their careers while making a positive impact.

Is this posting expired or inaccurate?