Location
Santa Clara, CA, Hillsboro, OR, Austin, TX, Phoenix, AZ
Type
Full-time
Posted
7/23/2026
Compensation
$233,990 - $330,340 per year
Job description
The role is for a highly experienced technical leader to head the PDK Architecture team at Intel, focusing on the execution of the Process Design Kit (PDK) across advanced technology nodes. This position serves as a bridge between Technology Development, PDK Development, and EDA partners, ensuring that technology requirements are effectively translated into high-quality PDK solutions. The leader will leverage deep technical expertise and cross-functional leadership to deliver predictable PDK outcomes for both internal and external customers. The role emphasizes collaboration, innovation, and the establishment of standards to enhance PDK development processes.
Requirements
- MS or PhD in Electrical Engineering, Computer Engineering, Physics, Materials Science, or a related discipline.
- 10+ years of experience in semiconductor technology development, design enablement, EDA, PDK development, CAD, DTCO, or related fields.
- Strong communication and executive presentation skills.
- Experience with foundry PDK development and release processes is preferred.
- Understanding of design rules, extraction, modeling, physical verification, custom design flows, APR flows, and validation methodologies.
Responsibilities
- Lead the definition and specification of PDK scope and content.
- Act as the primary interface to Technology Definition to align and finalize inputs for PDK.
- Drive technology closure and readiness assessments across various domains.
- Define and execute the architecture roadmap for 3DIC and advanced packaging PDK solutions.
- Own PDK specification methodology, quality standards, and governance processes.
Benefits
- Intel offers a comprehensive benefits package including competitive pay, stock programs, healthcare coverage, retirement plans, paid time off, parental leave, and programs supporting employee wellbeing and professional development.
Is this posting expired or inaccurate?
