Software Development Engineer II - ArcGIS Geocoding
Environmental Systems Research InstituteSoftware Development Engineer II - ArcGIS Geocoding
Environmental Systems Research InstituteLocation
Redlands, CA
Type
Full-time
Posted
8/24/2026
Compensation
$101,192 per year
Job description
The role involves developing global geocoding solutions and location-based APIs at Esri. You will collaborate with product engineers, developers, and users to enhance Esri software across various environments. This position focuses on writing scalable code and optimizing performance in C++ and C#. The opportunity also includes support for relocation to Redlands, CA.
Requirements
- 2+ years of related software development experience
- Strong development skills in C++ and/or C#/.NET
- Extensive experience with cloud-based architectures, microservices, and Kubernetes deployments
- Background in algorithms, data structures and use of common design patterns
- Excellent written and verbal communication skills
- Bachelor’s degree in Computer Science, Engineering, Mathematics, Information Systems, GIS, or related field
Responsibilities
- Write scalable, reusable, and maintainable code
- Integrate geocoding solutions into desktop, on-prem, and hosted architectures
- Design and implement efficient web services for high throughput data processing
- Optimize existing and new C++ code to reduce memory consumption and to increase performance and scalability
H-1B filing history
Public USCIS petition and DOL LCA counts · latest USCIS FY2026, LCA FY2026
Filing entity: Environmental Systems Research Institute Inc
As of Aug 23, 2026
Initial approvals
44
FY2026
Approval rate
98.9%
FY2026
LCA certified
67
FY2026
Entry-level share
49.3%
FY2026
Initial approvals YoY
+3%
Trend
LCA certified YoY
-31%
Trend
Initial approvals by fiscal year
Approval rate by fiscal year
Continuing vs initial approvals
LCA certified positions by quarter
LCA certified positions by fiscal year
Based on public USCIS and DOL filings; not a sponsorship guarantee.
Is this posting expired or inaccurate?
